Table 3

Summary of genetic variation at ten microsatellite loci for G. elliotii populations

Sampling location

Pocc6

Pocc8

Cum02

Cum10

Cum28

Cum32

Pat43

Lox4

Dpu15a

HeU5-A


DL

HE

0.455

0.367

0.628

0.905

0.091

0.740

0.312

0.558

0.861

0.662

HO

0.636

0.455

0.455

0.727

0.091

0.818

0.0

0.091

0.273*

0.636

NA

2

2

3

8

2

3

2

3

9

3

AR

1.455

1.368

1.628

1.889

1.091

1.647

1.312

1.468

1.837

1.662

FIS

-0.862

-0.282

-0.141

0.296

0.765

0.228

0.417

0.53

0.666

-0.076

ZD

HE

0.495

0.415

0.489

0.757

0.071

0.653

0.381

0.648

0.817

0.561

HO

0.642

0.5

0.357

0.143*

0.071

0.857

0.214

0.429

0.286*

0.857

NA

2

3

4

6

2

4

4

5

7

3

AR

1.495

1.415

1.489

1.667

1.071

1.653

1.381

1.606

1.802

1.574

FIS

-0.853

-0.295

-0.138

0.193

0.766

0.256

0.495

0.59

0.646

-0.092

WX

HE

0.495

0.363

0.67

0.593

0.703

0.813

0.264

0.703

0.747

0.791

HO

0.714

0.429

0.857

0.571

0.286

0.286

0.286

0.286

0.286

0.286

NA

2

2

3

5

2

4

2

3

4

4

AR

1.495

1.363

1.67

1.593

1.533

1.758

1.264

1.703

1.747

1.727

FIS

-0.926

-0.284

-0.04

0.284

0.687

0.025

0.565

0.55

0.667

-0.129

QL

HE

0.467

0.511

0.533

0.689

0.355

0.511

0.355

0.467

HO

0.6

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.6

NA

2

3

4

2

2

3

2

2

AR

1.467

1.511

1.533

1.536

1.356

1.511

1.356

1.467

FIS

-0.273

-0.061

0.266

0.073

0.467

0.57

0.652

-0.05

HB

HE

0.356

0.2

0.867

0.622

0.622

0.622

0.711

HO

0.4

0.2

0.6

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.0

NA

2

2

4

2

3

3

3

AR

1.356

1.2

1.821

1.429

1.622

1.622

1.711

FIS

-0.286

-0.07

0.277

0.085

0.57

0.644

-0.137

BC

HE

0.527

0.483

0.363

0.813

0.440

0.648

0.494

0.802

0.527

HO

0.571

0.286

0.143

0.857

0

0.142

0.143

0.286

0.286

NA

2

2

2

5

2

3

2

5

2

AR

1.527

1.303

1.363

1.813

1.440

1.733

1.622

1.622

1.711

FIS

-0.872

-0.288

-0.115

0.302

0.657

0.072

0.54

0.665

-0.095

YA

HE

0.4

0.12

0.592

0.858

0.325

0.875

0.233

0.742

0.575

0.6

HO

0.5

0.125

0.75

0.875

0.375

0.125*

0.25

0.375

0.125

0.25

NA

2

2

4

5

2

6

2

4

4

3

AR

1.4

1.125

1.292

1.824

1.325

1.846

1.233

1.742

1.575

1.484

FIS

-0.947

-0.287

-0.042

0.322

0.869

0.029

0.564

0.56

0.653

-0.098

MK

HE

0.582

0.476

0.669

0.783

0.632

0.706

0.632

0.743

0.804

0.632

HO

0.786

0.714

0.857

0.429

0.214

0.786

0.143

0.357

0.286*

0.643

NA

3

2

4

7

2

4

3

5

8

3

AR

1.582

1.476

1.618

1.783

1.518

1.706

1.362

1.743

1.775

1.540

FIS

-0.853

-0.205

-0.356

0.217

0.548

0.23

0.478

0.56

0.658

CD

HE

0.363

0.473

0.648

0.78

0.67

0.274

0.714

0.802

0.626

HO

0.429

0.571

0.714

0.285

0.714

0.143

0.143

0.714

0.857

NA

2

3

3

5

3

3

3

5

4

AR

1.363

1.473

1.648

1.78

1.670

1.275

1.621

1.802

1.626

FIS

-0.872

-0.283

-0.064

0.224

0.146

0.513

0.54

0.722

-0.014

RT

HE

0.667

0.5

0.667

1

0.667

0.5

0.667

0.83

0.83

HO

1

0.5

1

1

0.0

0.5

1

0.5

1

NA

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

3

3

AR

1.667

1.5

1.667

2

1.667

1.5

1.667

1.833

1.833

FIS

0.882

-0.283

-0.052

0.276

0.698

0.125

0.578

0.671

-0.045


HO, observed heterozygosity; HE, expected heterozygosity, NA, total number of alleles, AR, allelic richness, FIS, inbreeding coefficients. Significant deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium after adjusting the significance (alpha) level for the number of pairwise comparisons of populations and loci (n = 100, alpha = 0.0005). See Table 1 for abbreviations of sampling populations. Blanks indicate monomorphic loci.

Qu et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011 11:174   doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-174

Open Data