Table 3

Genetic diversity measurements for the eight cytb phylogroups obtained by the 95% SP unconnected subnetworks for Campostoma ornatum.

Phylogroup

n

S

H

Hd

π

k

FS (95% C.I.)

R2 (95% C.I.)


I

44

5

6

0.683

0.001

0.15

-0.77 (-3.66, 3.88)

0.11 (0.06, 0.23)

II

10

3

3

0.689

0.001

1.27

0.95 (-1.96, 3.34)

0.21 (0.14, 0.3)

III

30

7

6

0.655

0.002

0.8

0.08 (-3.73, 4.28)

0.14 (0.07, 0.2)

IV

10

7

5

0.8

0.1

2.09

-0.50 (-3.2, 3.59)

0.14 (0.11, 0.26)

V

10

1

2

0.56

0.0005

0.56

    1.09 (-0.34, 1.09)

    0.28 (0.18, 0.3)

VI

76

39

15

0.825

0.009

9.94

4.16 (-9.36, 7.18)

0.12 (0.05, 0.16)

VII

48

14

11

0.801

0.002

2.16

-2.51 (-5.99, 5.48)

0.07 (0.05, 0.18)

VIII

57

20

12

0.838

0.005

5.75

1.55 (-6.76, 5.68)

0.14 (0.05, 0.17)


n, number of individuals; NH, number of haplotypes; S, number of segregating sites; h, haplotype diversity; R, allelic richness after rarefaction; π, nucleotide diversity per site; and k, average number of nucleotide differences, the two largest values for each variable are highlighted in bold, whereas the two minimum ones are marked in italics.

Results for Fu's (FS) and Ramos-Onsins & Rozas' (R2) tests for detecting population growth are also shown. Values close to significance are displayed underlined.

Domínguez-Domínguez et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011 11:153   doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-153

Open Data