Table 2

Evidence for positive selection on SSSGP group members

Group

cDNA pair

Codon

dN/dS

dN ± SE

dS ± SE


SSSGP-1

1C1/1C2

85

1.32

0.11 ± 0.03

0.08 ± 0.04


SSSGP-2

G19B4/S21C6

122

9.43

0.12 ± 0.02

0.01 ± 0.01


SSSGP-2

G10H7/G14E6

129

3.59

0.08 ± 0.02

0.02 ± 0.01


SSSGP-2

L4C4/G28G12

78

1.12

0.22 ± 0.04

0.20 ± 0.07


SSSGP-4

G13E6/G22C4

127

1.21

0.10 ± 0.02

0.08 ± 0.04


SSSGP-4

G2C8/L4H12

173

1.46

0.14 ± 0.02

0.10 ± 0.03


SSSGP-4

G16C10/G29D6

156

2.49

0.26 ± 0.03

0.11 ± 0.03


SSSGP-4

G9B3/L1C12

179

1.52

0.13 ± 0.02

0.09 ± 0.03


SSSGP-6

G7H5/G8C4

81

2.92

0.31 ± 0.05

0.11 ± 0.05


SSSGP-7

G10C11/G15G6

119

1.48

0.11 ± 0.02

0.07 ± 0.03


SSSGP-10

G8C1/G14G1

75

2.51

0.18 ± 0.04

0.07 ± 0.03


SSSGP-26

G4C3/S22E4

162

5.67

0.04 ± 0.01

0.00 ± 0.00


SSSGP-31

G7D10/S4A9

100

1.82

0.06 ± 0.02

0.03 ± 0.03


SSSGP-37

S5E9/G9G9

41

2.51

0.11 ± 0.04

0.04 ± 0.04


SSSGP-79

S14G9/S22D12

63

18.8

0.19 ± 0.04

0.01 ± 0.01


SSSGP-80

L7H8/S8C9

123

1.84

0.04 ± 0.01

0.03 ± 0.02


dN/dS ratio were obtained by comparing MPCRs using PAML42 [53].

Chen et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010 10:296   doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-296

Open Data