Table 3

Estimates of evolutionary divergence between bovine archetypal WC1.1, bovine CD163A and bovine CD163c-α SRCR domains

BtWC1.1

SRCR domain

a

b

c

d

e

d'

1

2, 7

3, 8

4, 6, 9

5, 10

11


BtCD163A

h

1

0.551 (0.056)

0.667, 0.654 (0.053, 0.054)

0.641, 0.654 (0.054, 0.054)

0.462, 0.462, 0.500 (0.056, 0.056, 0.057)

0.705, 0.692 (0.052, 0.052)

0.500 (0.057)


i

2

0.526 (0.057)

0.577, 0.564 (0.056, 0.056)

0.590, 0.615 (0.056, 0.055)

0.436, 0.410, 0.436 (0.056, 0.056, 0.056)

0.705, 0.667 (0.052, 0.053)

0.487 (0.057)


j

3

0.500 (0.057)

0.679, 0.654 (0.053, 0.054)

0.654, 0.679 (0.054, 0.053)

0.449, 0.449, 0.449 (0.056, 0.056, 0.056)

0.705, 0.705 (0.052, 0.052)

0.500 (0.057)


k

4

0.564 (0.056)

0.654, 0.641 (0.054, 0.054)

0.615, 0.615 (0.055, 0.055)

0.564, 0.551, 0.577 (0.056, 0.056, 0.056)

0.705, 0.692 (0.052, 0.052)

0.500 (0.057)


b

5

0.551 (0.056)

0.449, 0.436 (0.056, 0.056)

0.577, 0.603 (0.056, 0.055)

0.526, 0.590, 0.513 (0.057, 0.056, 0.054)

0.718, 0.692 (0.051, 0.052)

0.538 (0.056)


c

6

0.590 (0.056)

0.615, 0.590 (0.055, 0.056)

0.513, 0.538 (0.057, 0.056)

0.513, 0.590, 0.526 (0.057, 0.056, 0.057)

0.769, 0.731 (0.048, 0.050)

0.603 (0.055)


d

7

0.487 (0.057)

0.641, 0.628 (0.054, 0.055)

0.590, 0.603 (0.056, 0.055)

0.218, 0.321, 0.218 (0.047, 0.053, 0.047)

0.667, 0.641 (0.053, 0.054)

0.474 (0.057)


e

8

0.744 (0.049)

0.731, 0.705 (0.050, 0.052)

0.731, 0.731 (0.050, 0.050)

0.718, 0.744, 0.692 (0.051, 0.049, 0.052)

0.513, 0.500 (0.057, 0.057)

0.692 (0.052)


d'

9

0.526 (0.057)

0.615, 0.590 (0.055, 0.056)

0.590, 0.590 (0.056, 0.056)

0.423, 0.436, 0.397 (0.056, 0.056, 0.055)

0.679, 0.667 (0.053, 0.053)

0.359 (0.054)


BtCD163c-α

m

1

0.654 (0.054)

0.756, 0.731 (0.049. 0.050)

0.679, 0.679 (0.053, 0.053)

0.654, 0.667, 0.654 (0.054, 0.053, 0.054)

0.795, 0.769 (0.046, 0.048)

0.628 (0.055)


l

2

0.718 (0.051)

0.692, 0.705 (0.052, 0.052)

0.705, 0.718 (0.052, 0.051)

0.654, 0.654, 0.667 (0.054, 0.054, 0.053)

0.769, 0.795 (0.048, 0.046)

0.679 (0.053)


b

3

0.551 (0.056)

0.538, 0.526 (0.056, 0.057)

0.577, 0.577 (0.056, 0.056)

0.513, 0.577, 0.526 (0.057, 0.056, 0.057)

0.718, 0.692 (0.051, 0.052)

0.526 (0.057)


c

4

0.603 (0.055)

0.628, 0.615 (0.055, 0.055)

0.526, 0.538 (0.057, 0.056)

0.603, 0.615, 0.603 (0.055, 0.055, 0.055)

0.744, 0.744 (0.049, 0.049)

0.615 (0.055)


n

5

0.513 (0.057)

0.679, 0.667 (0.053, 0.053)

0.654, 0.654 (0.054, 0.054)

0.564, 0.590, 0.564 (0.056, 0.056, 0.056)

0.744, 0.756 (0.049, 0.049)

0.564 (0.056)


d

6

0.500 (0.057)

0.577, 0.564 (0.056, 0.056)

0.577, 0.590 (0.056, 0.056)

0.346, 0.423, 0.333 (0.054, 0.056, 0.053)

0.679, 0.667 (0.053, 0.053)

0.487 (0.057)


e

7

0.705 (0.052)

0.667, 0.679 (0.056, 0.056)

0.692, 0.718 (0.052, 0.051)

0.628, 0.641, 0.628 (0.055, 0.054, 0.055)

0.526, 0.526 (0.057, 0.057)

0.615 (0.055)


d'

8

0.526 (0.057)

0.577, 0.577 (0.053, 0.053)

0.615, 0.615 (0.055, 0.055)

0.436, 0.423, 0.397 (0.056, 0.056, 0.055)

0.615, 0.615 (0.055, 0.055)

0.321 (0.053)


Analyses were conducted as described in Table 1.

Herzig et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010 10:181   doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-181

Open Data