|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 4.
Patterns of cell proliferation in response to wound healing. Longitudinal sections were labeled with an antibody against BrdU (green) and Hoescht
dye (red) to determine cell proliferation in the longitudinal muscle (LM) and coelomic
epithelia (CE). (A) Actively dividing cells were mainly observed in the coelomic epithelia
proximal to the injury at 6 dpi. Note that not only the number of dividing cells appears
higher but the coelomic epithelium has increased in width. Some cell division is also
observed in the muscle layer (arrows) (B) An area distal to the injury site shows
much less cell proliferation and a thinner coelomic epithelium. (C) Control (sham-operated)
animal at 6 dpi only shows modest cell division and a very thin coelomic epithelium.
(D) Minimal cell division is observed at 20 dpi suggesting the stage-dependent role
that cell division plays in wound healing. (E) Quantification of cell division at
the injury site shows a peak in cell proliferation at 6 dpi. (F) The coelomic epithelia
of experimental animals show the largest percentage of diving cells also peaking at
6 dpi. Values of control animals increase slightly but remain significantly lower
than experimental animals. (G) Cell division in the longitudinal muscles follows a
similar pattern with a sudden peak in cell division at 6 dpi, however the percentage
of proliferating cells is much lower than for the coelomic epithelium. CE-coelomic
epithelia, LM-longitudinal muscle. PE-Proximal epithelium, PE-C Proximal epithelium-Control,
PM Proximal muscle, PM-C Proximal muscle-Control. Bar = 25 μm. Each point represents
the mean ± S.E. of at least three animals. *p < .05, **p < .01.
San Miguel-Ruiz and García-Arrarás BMC Developmental Biology 2007 7:115 doi:10.1186/1471-213X-7-115 |