|
BMC Cell Biology
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 Research articleComparative study of mesenchymal stem cells from C57BL/10 and mdx miceYong Li2 , Cheng Zhang1,2 , Fu Xiong2 , Mei-juan Yu2 , Fu-lin Peng1 , Yan-chang Shang1 , Cui-ping Zhao1 , Yong-feng Xu4 , Zheng-shan Liu2 , Chang Zhou1 and Jin-lang Wu3  1
Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ProC 2
Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ProC 3
Department of electron microscope, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ProC 4
Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ProC author email corresponding author email
BMC Cell Biology 2008,
9:24doi:10.1186/1471-2121-9-24 Abstract
Background
Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been studied and applied extensively because of their ability to self-renew and differentiate into various cell types. Since most human diseases models are murine, mouse MSCs should have been studied in detail. The mdx mouse – a Duchenne muscular dystrophy model – was produced by introducing a point mutation in the dystrophin gene. To understand the role of dystrophin in MSCs, we compared MSCs from mdx and C57BL/10 mice, focusing particularly on the aspects of light and electron microscopic morphology, immunophenotyping, and differentiation potential.
Results
Our study showed that at passage 10, mdx-MSCs exhibited increased heterochromatin, larger vacuoles, and more lysosomes under electron microscopy compared to C57BL/10-MSCs. C57BL/10-MSCs formed a few myotubes, while mdx-MSCs did not at the same passages. By passage 21, mdx-MSCs but not C57BL/10-MSCs had gradually lost their proliferative ability. In addition, a significant difference in the expression of CD34, not Sca-1 and CD11b, was observed between the MSCs from the 2 mice.
Conclusion
Our current study reveals that the MSCs from the 2 mice, namely, C57BL/10 and mdx, exhibit differences in proliferative and myogenic abilities. The results suggest that the changes in mouse MSC behavior may be influenced by lack of dystrophin protein in mdx mouse. |