|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 5.
Quantitation of protein deposition using SPRI. A) Representative SPR images (using 470 nm incident light) of individual 300 μm
squares of fibronectin for regions of relatively high and low cell density. Fibronectin
areas are separated by areas of PEG which are resistant to protein adsorption. Image
contrast is optimized to aid visualization of differences in protein deposition. The
intensity values correspond to reflectivity values shown in the scale bar; reflectivity
values > 0.200 appear white and < 0.165 appear black. To determine the amount of protein
added to the surface during 24 h in the presence of cells, a 100 μm square region
of interest (magenta box) adjacent to cells was selected, and SPR reflectivity within
the blue box was averaged and converted to mass/area. A similar region was selected
from a region with no cells. B) Bar graphs show that mass of material added to the
surface at different steps, and in areas largely devoid of cells and areas containing
cells. Mean values and standard deviations are the result from 5 imaged areas. C)
Image analysis is used to quantify protein deposition at the cell periphery after
24 h in culture by dilating the cell contours to extract protein mass versus distance
from the cell edge in a region where 18% of the area is occupied by cells (approximately
25 cells per field of view). Sequential dilation operations are performed in 1-μm
increments. The magenta-colored contours overlay fibronectin regions; green contours
overlay PEG-thiol regions. The lines shown around the cells correspond to a distance
of 40 μm from the cell edges. Protein coverage in ng/cm2 is determined from the average reflectivity values for each sequential contour. Protein
versus distance from cell edge is shown for fibronectin-coated regions (D). The corresponding
plot in green is for the PEG-thiol regions (E). The error bars represent the standard
deviation from 4 different sample regions. Scale bars = 100 μm. See text for a more
complete description of the collection of these data.
Peterson et al. BMC Cell Biology 2009 10:16 doi:10.1186/1471-2121-10-16 |