BMC Bioinformatics

official impact factor 3.03

Open Access Highly Access Research article

Biclustering via optimal re-ordering of data matrices in systems biology: rigorous methods and comparative studies

Peter A DiMaggio1, Scott R McAllister1, Christodoulos A Floudas1*, Xiao-Jiang Feng2, Joshua D Rabinowitz2 and Herschel A Rabitz2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

2 Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:458 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-458

Published: 27 October 2008

Abstract

Background

The analysis of large-scale data sets via clustering techniques is utilized in a number of applications. Biclustering in particular has emerged as an important problem in the analysis of gene expression data since genes may only jointly respond over a subset of conditions. Biclustering algorithms also have important applications in sample classification where, for instance, tissue samples can be classified as cancerous or normal. Many of the methods for biclustering, and clustering algorithms in general, utilize simplified models or heuristic strategies for identifying the "best" grouping of elements according to some metric and cluster definition and thus result in suboptimal clusters.

Results

In this article, we present a rigorous approach to biclustering, OREO, which is based on the Optimal RE-Ordering of the rows and columns of a data matrix so as to globally minimize the dissimilarity metric. The physical permutations of the rows and columns of the data matrix can be modeled as either a network flow problem or a traveling salesman problem. Cluster boundaries in one dimension are used to partition and re-order the other dimensions of the corresponding submatrices to generate biclusters. The performance of OREO is tested on (a) metabolite concentration data, (b) an image reconstruction matrix, (c) synthetic data with implanted biclusters, and gene expression data for (d) colon cancer data, (e) breast cancer data, as well as (f) yeast segregant data to validate the ability of the proposed method and compare it to existing biclustering and clustering methods.

Conclusion

We demonstrate that this rigorous global optimization method for biclustering produces clusters with more insightful groupings of similar entities, such as genes or metabolites sharing common functions, than other clustering and biclustering algorithms and can reconstruct underlying fundamental patterns in the data for several distinct sets of data matrices arising in important biological applications.