Table 2

Discriminating experimental complexes from threaded models

Superfamily identifiers

Superfamily names

sequence Id ranges (%)

number of complexes

number of tests

number of successesa

DFIREβ

Launay


a.133.1

Phospholipase A2

33–99

11

110

77

62

d.17.4

NTF2-like

11–98

13

156

140

92

b.29.1

lectins

33–99

15

210

205

148

c.61.1

Ribosyltransferase

15–99

10

90

80

65

e.3.1

β lactamase-like

9–100

11

110

107

59

d.5.1

RNase A-like

25–94

6

30

26

17

c.2.1

Rossmann-fold

11–43

14

182

174

152

a.118.6 a.102.4

Prenylyltransferase

94–99

8

56

56

27

RhoGDI/Ras

54–94/73–100

4

12

11

6

FGF receptor/FGF

20–35/22–62

3

6

6

6

Trypsin/inhibitor

30–100/10–100

12

132

127

87

Trypsin/inhibitor

65–83/56–71

3

6

4

1

Peptidase M10/TIMP

42–98/50–100

3

6

4

6

Trypsin/inhibitor

14/98

2

2

2

1

Trypsin/inhibitor

39/42

2

2

2

0

Collicin, Pyocin/HNH

39/42

2

2

2

1

Elongation factor/EF-TS

20–57/6–22

4

12

12

7

Total

123

1124

1035

737


aThe number of tests giving a positive Sthread score. Both the 6-class, residue-based and the DFIREβ, atom-based were used for scoring.

Launay and Simonson BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9:427   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-427

Open Data