Table 6

Comparison of performance for the CNS and Lung Cancer data sets using six classifiers with the same number of genes chosen by three gene selection methods

Data Sets

Gene Selection Methods

Classifiers

m-fold of genes


1-fold

2-fold

3-fold

4-fold

5-fold


CNS

GDI.Dominant

OVO.SVM-L

35.5 ± 1.0

32.0 ± 1.1

27.4 ± 1.0

26.6 ± 1.1

24.3 ± 1.0

OVO.SVM-R

36.5 ± 1.1

30.8 ± 1.1

27.4 ± 1.1

25.8 ± 1.1

24.0 ± 1.0

OVA.SVM-L

35.9 ± 1.4

32.8 ± 1.2

28.8 ± 1.0

27.8 ± 1.0

26.3 ± 1.0

OVA.SVM-R

35.2 ± 1.2

29.9 ± 1.2

27.7 ± 1.0

26.3 ± 1.0

25.3 ± 1.0

NMC

33.5 ± 1.1

27.0 ± 1.0

23.7 ± 1.0

22.9 ± 1.0

21.4 ± 0.9

NNC

33.0 ± 1.1

28.1 ± 1.1

25.6 ± 1.0

26.1 ± 0.9

25.1 ± 0.9


OVA.SNR [12]

OVO.SVM-L

37.1 ± 1.1

30.5 ± 1.0

27.0 ± 1.0

23.5 ± 1.0

21.6 ± 1.0

OVO.SVM-R

35.9 ± 1.1

29.6 ± 1.0

27.1 ± 1.0

23.2 ± 1.0

21.6 ± 1.0

OVA.SVM-L

36.8 ± 1.1

30.9 ± 1.1

26.8 ± 0.9

22.8 ± 0.9

20.8 ± 0.9

OVA.SVM-R

35.2 ± 1.1

29.1 ± 0.9

26.1 ± 0.9

23.7 ± 0.9

21.6 ± 1.0

NMC

32.8 ± 1.1

26.3 ± 1.0

23.5 ± 1.0

20.6 ± 0.8

18.5 ± 0.9

NNC

34.9 ± 1.0

28.3 ± 1.0

26.0 ± 1.0

24.0 ± 0.9

21.5 ± 1.0


ANOVA+Correlation [11]

OVO.SVM-L

38.5 ± 1.1

32.2 ± 1.0

27.0 ± 0.9

24.0 ± 0.8

21.6 ± 0.8

OVO.SVM-R

37.1 ± 1.1

30.8 ± 1.0

27.4 ± 1.0

25.0 ± 0.9

21.4 ± 0.8

OVA.SVM-L

38.5 ± 1.1

33.4 ± 1.0

27.4 ± 1.0

25.5 ± 0.8

23.2 ± 0.8

OVA.SVM-R

35.8 ± 1.1

31.0 ± 1.1

26.0 ± 1.0

25.1 ± 0.8

24.1 ± 0.9

NMC

33.7 ± 1.3

24.9 ± 0.9

20.8 ± 0.8

19.7 ± 0.8

19.2 ± 0.8

NNC

36.0 ± 1.2

29.7 ± 1.0

24.4 ± 0.9

23.3 ± 0.8

21.4 ± 0.7


Lung Cancer

GDI.Dominant

OVO.SVM-L

9.5 ± 0.3

8.1 ± 0.3

7.8 ± 0.3

7.8 ± 0.3

7.4 ± 0.3

OVO.SVM-R

10.0 ± 0.4

8.3 ± 0.3

8.1 ± 0.3

7.1 ± 0.3

6.9 ± 0.3

OVA.SVM-L

9.4 ± 0.3

7.7 ± 0.3

7.8 ± 0.3

7.5 ± 0.3

7.8 ± 0.3

OVA.SVM-R

10.1 ± 0.3

8.3 ± 0.3

8.2 ± 0.3

7.5 ± 0.3

7.4 ± 0.3

NMC

9.8 ± 0.4

7.2 ± 0.3

6.3 ± 0.2

5.8 ± 0.2

5.8 ± 0.3

NNC

11.9 ± 0.4

9.0 ± 0.3

8.3 ± 0.3

7.7 ± 0.2

7.3 ± 0.3


OVA.SNR [12]

OVO.SVM-L

9.8 ± 0.3

8.0 ± 0.3

8.1 ± 0.3

8.0 ± 0.3

7.4 ± 0.3

OVO.SVM-R

10.2 ± 0.3

8.8 ± 0.3

7.6 ± 0.3

7.4 ± 0.3

7.2 ± 0.2

OVA.SVM-L

9.6 ± 0.3

8.3 ± 0.3

7.9 ± 0.3

7.9 ± 0.3

7.9 ± 0.3

OVA.SVM-R

10.0 ± 0.3

8.7 ± 0.3

8.1 ± 0.3

7.7 ± 0.3

7.2 ± 0.3

NMC

9.5 ± 0.3

7.6 ± 0.3

6.7 ± 0.2

6.5 ± 0.2

6.1 ± 0.2

NNC

11.9 ± 0.3

9.3 ± 0.3

7.8 ± 0.2

7.3 ± 0.2

7.4 ± 0.3


ANOVA+Correlation [11]

OVO.SVM-L

6.9 ± 0.3

7.5 ± 0.3

7.4 ± 0.3

7.5 ± 0.3

7.7 ± 0.3

OVO.SVM-R

7.6 ± 0.3

7.1 ± 0.3

6.4 ± 0.3

6.6 ± 0.2

6.7 ± 0.3

OVA.SVM-L

7.1 ± 0.3

6.9 ± 0.3

7.1 ± 0.3

8.1 ± 0.3

7.8 ± 0.3

OVA.SVM-R

7.9 ± 0.3

7.4 ± 0.3

7.1 ± 0.3

7.4 ± 0.3

6.7 ± 0.3

NMC

7.8 ± 0.3

6.3 ± 0.3

5.7 ± 0.2

5.1 ± 0.2

5.3 ± 0.2

NNC

9.8 ± 0.3

8.0 ± 0.3

7.5 ± 0.3

7.3 ± 0.3

6.7 ± 0.3


Here m-fold corresponds to the case when m top most dominant genes are used for each class. For example, the column labeled 3-fold represents the results using 15 genes (3 dominant genes from each of the 5 classes) for both the CNS and Lung Cancer data sets.

Tsai et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9:425   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-425

Open Data