|
Comparison among the BLAST, NNA, and ECOC algorithm |
|||
| Target |
BLAST |
NNA |
ECOC |
| Success rate |
Success rate |
Success rate |
|
|
|
|||
| basic-TF |
25/37 = 67.57% |
34/37 = 91.89% |
36/37 = 97.30% |
| zinc-TF |
29/33 = 87.88% |
31/33 = 93.94% |
32/33 = 96.97% |
| helix-TF |
33/36 = 91.67% |
34/36 = 94.44% |
35/36 = 97.22% |
| beta-TF |
27/32 = 84.38% |
28/32 = 87.50% |
32/32 = 100.00% |
| Overall |
114/138 = 82.61% |
127/138 = 92.03% |
135/138 = 97.83% |
Zheng et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9:282 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-282 |
|||