Major copy proportion analysis of tumor samples using SNP arrays

doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-204

BMC Bioinformatics

Volume 9

Viewing options:

Abstract
Full text
PDF (475KB)

Associated material:

Related literature:

Articles citing this article
on BioMed Central
on Google Scholar
on ISI Web of Science
on PubMed Central
Other articles by authors
on Google Scholar

Li C
Beroukhim R
Weir BA
Winckler W
Garraway LA
Sellers WR
Meyerson M

on PubMed

Li C
Beroukhim R
Weir BA
Winckler W
Garraway LA
Sellers WR
Meyerson M
Related articles/pages
on Google

on Google Scholar

on PubMed

Tools:

Post to:

Research article

Major copy proportion analysis of tumor samples using SNP arrays

Cheng Li¹ , Rameen Beroukhim²^,3 , Barbara A Weir²^,3 , Wendy Winckler²^,3 , Levi A Garraway²^,3 , William R Sellers⁴ and Matthew Meyerson²^,3

¹Departments of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, 3 Blackfan Circle, Boston, MA 02115, USA

²Deparment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, 44 Binney St., Boston, MA 02115, USA

³Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 320 Charles Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA

⁴Novartis Institutes of BioMedical Research, 250 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

author email corresponding author email

BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:204doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-204


Published:	21 April 2008

Abstract

Background

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common genetic variations in the human genome and are useful as genomic markers. Oligonucleotide SNP microarrays have been developed for high-throughput genotyping of up to 900,000 human SNPs and have been used widely in linkage and cancer genomics studies. We have previously used Hidden Markov Models (HMM) to analyze SNP array data for inferring copy numbers and loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) from paired normal and tumor samples and unpaired tumor samples.

Results

We proposed and implemented major copy proportion (MCP) analysis of oligonucleotide SNP array data. A HMM was constructed to infer unobserved MCP states from observed allele-specific signals through emission and transition distributions. We used 10 K, 100 K and 250 K SNP array datasets to compare MCP analysis with LOH and copy number analysis, and showed that MCP performs better than LOH analysis for allelic-imbalanced chromosome regions and normal contaminated samples. The major and minor copy alleles can also be inferred from allelic-imbalanced regions by MCP analysis.

Conclusion

MCP extends tumor LOH analysis to allelic imbalance analysis and supplies complementary information to total copy numbers. MCP analysis of mixing normal and tumor samples suggests the utility of MCP analysis of normal-contaminated tumor samples. The described analysis and visualization methods are readily available in the user-friendly dChip software.