|
Number of times interacting alleles were observed as highest scoring model (rank = 1) or second (rank = 2) using PIA 2.0a for 2-SNP interactions using imbalanced simulated data sets |
|||||||||
| Scoring Function |
|||||||||
| Model Numberb |
Case:Control Ratio |
Rank |
Sensitivity +Specificity |
PPV+NPV |
Risk Ratio |
Odds Ratio |
Gini Index |
Probability Difference |
Total (Overall)c |
|
|
|||||||||
| 55 |
1:2 |
1 |
72 |
72 |
69 |
72 |
81 |
74 |
82 |
| 2 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
9 |
8 |
6 |
||
| 1:4 |
1 |
56 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
61 |
63 |
67 |
|
| 2 |
9 |
13 |
10 |
13 |
11 |
11 |
7 |
||
| 56 |
1:2 |
1 |
69 |
67 |
59 |
67 |
83 |
73 |
79 |
| 2 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
9 |
10 |
||
| 1:4 |
1 |
45 |
43 |
38 |
43 |
62 |
52 |
62 |
|
| 2 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
15 |
12 |
11 |
||
| 57 |
1:2 |
1 |
63 |
62 |
45 |
62 |
82 |
69 |
76 |
| 2 |
6 |
7 |
12 |
7 |
7 |
14 |
8 |
||
| 1:4 |
1 |
51 |
49 |
34 |
49 |
67 |
53 |
66 |
|
| 2 |
10 |
8 |
16 |
8 |
10 |
14 |
9 |
||
| 58 |
1:2 |
1 |
87 |
86 |
79 |
86 |
96 |
92 |
95 |
| 2 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
||
| 1:4 |
1 |
73 |
70 |
66 |
69 |
84 |
79 |
84 |
|
| 2 |
8 |
8 |
15 |
9 |
10 |
8 |
7 |
||
| 59 |
1:2 |
1 |
64 |
61 |
62 |
61 |
72 |
72 |
70 |
| 2 |
6 |
9 |
12 |
9 |
7 |
7 |
10 |
||
| 1:4 |
1 |
54 |
50 |
45 |
50 |
48 |
60 |
61 |
|
| 2 |
8 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
19 |
8 |
13 |
||
|
a Data were generated using fractional occupations to assign case versus control status (IFRACT = 1) and excluded the training data when scoring and running 10 10-fold cross-validations for functions 1–5 (ITRAIN = 0, FRACT = 0.1, NTIME = 10). Training data is included in Additional file 1, Table S2. b Simulated data sets were described previously [14] and were obtained from Dr. Moore by request. c Total score is the summation over all scoring functions after linearly scaling the score for each individual function such that the top score is 50.0. | |||||||||
Mechanic et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9:146 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-146 |
|||||||||