Table 4 |
|||
|
Comparison of RAR with other measures applied to the small example of Figure 1. |
|||
|
Clusterings compared |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Clustering comparison measures [reference] |
A-B |
A-C |
A-D |
|
|
|||
|
Rand [2] |
0.92 |
0.92 |
0.92 |
|
HA [4] |
0.77 |
0.77 |
0.77 |
|
Jaccard [5] |
0.70 |
0.70 |
0.70 |
|
Wallace forward [6] |
0.70 |
0.70 |
0.70 |
|
Wallace reverse [6] |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Larsen forward [7] |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
|
Larsen reverse [7] |
0.81 |
0.81 |
0.81 |
|
MH [8] |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
|
Variation of Information [8] |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
|
Van Dongen [9] |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
RAR |
0.38 |
0.29 |
0.67 |
|
|
|||
|
Coordinates of the points in the four clusterings (A, B, C and D) of Figure 1 were used to compute RAR and other 10 measures of clustering agreement. |
|||
|
Pinto et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2007 8:44 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-44 |
|||
