Table 1 |
||||||
|
Ranking of each clustering algorithm across all comparative validation cases |
||||||
|
Dataset |
Validation case |
FLAME |
Hierarchical |
K-Means |
F-SOM |
FCM |
|
|
||||||
|
RPBM |
2-Norm FOM |
1 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
|
Range FOM |
2 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
Partition Index |
2 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
HR |
2-Norm FOM* |
5 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
|
Range FOM* |
2 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
Partition Index |
1 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
CAVA |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
Spreading Index |
2 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
YCC |
2-Norm FOM* |
4 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
Range FOM* |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
Partition Index |
1 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
CAVA |
1 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
Spreading Index |
1 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
MT |
Partition Index |
1 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
|
CAVA |
1 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
Spreading Index |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
* Reduced versions of the datasets were used for these FOM analyses, due to excessive computation time required for the full-sized dataset (See Methods). |
||||||
|
Fu and Medico BMC Bioinformatics 2007 8:3 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-3 |
||||||