BMC Bioinformatics Volume 8
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
Research articleComparing segmentations by applying randomization techniquesNiina Haiminen1 , Heikki Mannila1,2 and Evimaria Terzi1  1HIIT Basic Research Unit, Department of Computer Science, P.O.Box 68, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 2Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, Helsinki University of Technology, FI-02015 TKK, Finland author email corresponding author email
BMC Bioinformatics 2007,
8:171doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-171 Abstract
Background
There exist many segmentation techniques for genomic sequences, and the segmentations can also be based on many different biological features. We show how to evaluate and compare the quality of segmentations obtained by different techniques and alternative biological features.
Results
We apply randomization techniques for evaluating the quality of a given segmentation. Our example applications include isochore detection and the discovery of coding-noncoding structure. We obtain segmentations of relevant sequences by applying different techniques, and use alternative features to segment on. We show that some of the obtained segmentations are very similar to the underlying true segmentations, and this similarity is statistically significant. For some other segmentations, we show that equally good results are likely to appear by chance.
Conclusion
We introduce a framework for evaluating segmentation quality, and demonstrate its use on two examples of segmental genomic structures. We transform the process of quality evaluation from simply viewing the segmentations, to obtaining p-values denoting significance of segmentation similarity. |