BMC Bioinformatics

official impact factor 3.03

This article is part of the supplement: Symposium of Computations in Bioinformatics and Bioscience (SCBB06)

Open Access Research

Comparison of transcriptional responses in liver tissue and primary hepatocyte cell cultures after exposure to hexahydro-1, 3, 5-trinitro-1, 3, 5-triazine

Edward J Perkins1*, Wenjun Bao2, Xin Guan3, Choo-Yaw Ang3, Russell D Wolfinger2, Tzu-Ming Chu2, Sharon A Meyer4 and Laura S Inouye1

Author Affiliations

1 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS, USA

2 SAS Institute Inc, SAS Campus Drive, Cary, NC, USA

3 SpecPro, Vicksburg, MS, USA

4 University of Louisiana at Monroe, Monroe, LA, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7(Suppl 4):S22 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-S4-S22

Published: 12 December 2006

Abstract

Background

Cell culture systems are useful in studying toxicological effects of chemicals such as Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), however little is known as to how accurately isolated cells reflect responses of intact organs. In this work, we compare transcriptional responses in livers of Sprague-Dawley rats and primary hepatocyte cells after exposure to RDX to determine how faithfully the in vitro model system reflects in vivo responses.

Results

Expression patterns were found to be markedly different between liver tissue and primary cell cultures before exposure to RDX. Liver gene expression was enriched in processes important in toxicology such as metabolism of amino acids, lipids, aromatic compounds, and drugs when compared to cells. Transcriptional responses in cells exposed to 7.5, 15, or 30 mg/L RDX for 24 and 48 hours were different from those of livers isolated from rats 24 hours after exposure to 12, 24, or 48 mg/Kg RDX. Most of the differentially expressed genes identified across conditions and treatments could be attributed to differences between cells and tissue. Some similarity was observed in RDX effects on gene expression between tissue and cells, but also significant differences that appear to reflect the state of the cell or tissue examined.

Conclusion

Liver tissue and primary cells express different suites of genes that suggest they have fundamental differences in their cell physiology. Expression effects related to RDX exposure in cells reflected a fraction of liver responses indicating that care must be taken in extrapolating from primary cells to whole animal organ toxicity effects.