BMC Bioinformatics
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
Methodology articleA graph-search framework for associating gene identifiers with documentsWilliam W Cohen1,2,3 and Einat Minkov2  1
Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA 2
Language Technology Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA 3
Center for Bioimage Informatics, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA author email corresponding author email
BMC Bioinformatics 2006,
7:440doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-440
|
|
| Published: |
10 October 2006 |
Abstract
Background
One step in the model organism database curation process is to find, for each article, the identifier of every gene discussed in the article. We consider a relaxation of this problem suitable for semi-automated systems, in which each article is associated with a ranked list of possible gene identifiers, and experimentally compare methods for solving this geneId ranking problem. In addition to baseline approaches based on combining named entity recognition (NER) systems with a "soft dictionary" of gene synonyms, we evaluate a graph-based method which combines the outputs of multiple NER systems, as well as other sources of information, and a learning method for reranking the output of the graph-based method.
Results
We show that named entity recognition (NER) systems with similar F-measure performance can have significantly different performance when used with a soft dictionary for geneId-ranking. The graph-based approach can outperform any of its component NER systems, even without learning, and learning can further improve the performance of the graph-based ranking approach.
Conclusion
The utility of a named entity recognition (NER) system for geneId-finding may not be accurately predicted by its entity-level F1 performance, the most common performance measure. GeneId-ranking systems are best implemented by combining several NER systems. With appropriate combination methods, usefully accurate geneId-ranking systems can be constructed based on easily-available resources, without resorting to problem-specific, engineered components. |