Table 5 |
|||||
|
Fractional scores of the confidence assignment schemes in each of the five quality measures*. |
|||||
|
Probability Scheme |
Gene Ontology (SC) |
Interaction Conservation (SC at 1 × 10-10) |
Gene Expression (SC) |
SNR |
Conservation Coherency (SC) |
|
|
|||||
|
DENG: Deng et al. |
1.00 |
0.76 |
-- |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
BADER_HIGH: Bader et al. (high) |
-- |
1.00 |
-- |
0.77 |
0.74 |
|
BADER_LOW: Bader et al. (low) |
0.86 |
0.98 |
1.00 |
0.77 |
0.64 |
|
SHARAN: Sharan et al. |
0.96 |
1.00 |
0.27 |
0.78 |
0.89 |
|
DEANE: Deane et al. |
0.78 |
0.73 |
-- |
0.57 |
0.80 |
|
QI: Qi et al. |
-- |
0.58 |
-- |
0.74 |
0.57 |
|
|
|||||
|
*Fractional scores are between [0,1] with 1 performing the best (indicated in bold for each measure). Cells with a dash (-) indicate circularity, i.e., the measures used as (full or partial) input to the corresponding probability schemes. SC: Spearman Correlation; SNR: Signal to Noise Ratio. |
|||||
|
Suthram et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2006 7:360 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-360 |
|||||
