Methodology article
Quality control for terms and definitions in ontologies and taxonomies
-
* Corresponding author: Jacob Köhler jacob.koehler@bbsrc.ac.uk
1 Biomathematics and Bioinformatics Division, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK
2 Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo, NY, USA
3 Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
4 Technical Faculty, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:212 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-212
Published: 19 April 2006Additional files
Additional File 1:
Circular definitions, circularity index ≥ 0.5 (See also Figure 1, A1)
Format: OUT Size: 342KB Download file
Additional File 2:
Non-circular definitions, circularity index < 0.5 (See also Figure 1, A2)
Format: OUT Size: 5.2MB Download file
Additional File 3:
Unintelligible definitions, intelligibility index < 0.7 (See also Figure 1, B1)
Format: OUT Size: 1.6MB Download file
Additional File 4:
Intelligible definitions, intelligibility index ≥ 0.7, (See also Figure 1, B2)
Format: OUT Size: 2.7MB Download file
Additional File 5:
Unintelligible terms, intelligibility index < 0.7 (See also Figure 1, C1)
Format: OUT Size: 1.9MB Download file
Additional File 6:
Unintelligible terms with proposed alternative definitions, intelligibility index < 0.7 (See also Figure 1, C1)
Format: OUT Size: 4MB Download file
Additional File 7:
Intelligible terms, intelligibility index ≥ 0.7, (See also Figure 1, C2)
Format: OUT Size: 791KB Download file
Additional File 8:
Evaluation of the circularity index, full evaluation results for the intelligibility score and the circularity index
Format: OUT Size: 22KB Download file
Additional File 9:
Evaluation of the intelligibility index, full evaluation results for the intelligibility score and the intelligibility index
Format: OUT Size: 25KB Download file