Table 9 |
||||
|
The comparison of R-SVM vs. WV on Data-S |
||||
|
Levela |
ReduceTestd |
P(test-diff)e |
ImproveRecf |
P(rec-diff)g |
|
|
||||
|
800 |
-12.32% |
1.58E-04 |
-4.01% |
8.77E-33 |
|
600 |
-30.90% |
1.38E-19 |
-0.16% |
0.482 |
|
500 |
-40.09% |
2.98E-32 |
-0.03% |
0.940 |
|
400 |
-48.92% |
2.95E-37 |
-2.21% |
1.29E-11 |
|
300 |
-58.87% |
1.54E-44 |
-6.81% |
2.56E-35 |
|
200 |
-64.05% |
1.72E-48 |
-13.73% |
2.35E-53 |
|
150 |
-60.96% |
1.83E-47 |
-15.52% |
2.15E-52 |
|
100 |
-56.41% |
2.62E-49 |
-19.58% |
1.29E-57 |
|
90 |
-52.91% |
1.58E-42 |
-19.14% |
1.18E-51 |
|
80 |
-50.73% |
2.35E-41 |
-19.08% |
1.31E-51 |
|
70 |
-47.11% |
4.02E-40 |
-18.27% |
6.03E-47 |
|
60 |
-43.29% |
6.80E-38 |
-17.58% |
1.18E-42 |
|
50 |
-36.01% |
1.06E-34 |
-16.35% |
1.34E-37 |
|
|
||||
|
a,d,e,f,g Same as in Table 8. |
||||
|
Zhang et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2006 7:197 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-197 |
||||
