Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data
-
* Corresponding author: Kerby Shedden kshedden@umich.edu
BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:26 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-6-26
Accesses
- Last 30 days: 60 accesses
- Last 365 days: 593 accesses
- All time: 8552 accesses
Cited by
BioMed Central: 13 citations
|
Methodology
Tara J Holman, Michael H Wilson, Kim Kenobi, Ian L Dryden, T Hodgman, Andrew TA Wood, Michael J Holdsworth Plant Methods 2010, 6:9 (15 March 2010) |
|
Methodology article
Jakub Mieczkowski, Magdalena E Tyburczy, Michal Dabrowski, Piotr Pokarowski BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:104 (24 February 2010) |
|
Database
Adriane Menßen, Götz Edinger, Joachim R Grün, Ulrike Haase, Ria Baumgrass, Andreas Grützkau, Andreas Radbruch, Gerd-R Burmester, Thomas Häupl BMC Genomics 2009, 10:98 (5 March 2009) |
|
Methodology article
Comparison of small n statistical tests of differential expression applied to microarrays Carl Murie, Owen Woody, Anna Y Lee, Robert Nadon BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:45 (3 February 2009) |
|
Research article
Methods for evaluating gene expression from Affymetrix microarray datasets Ning Jiang, Lindsey J Leach, Xiaohua Hu, Elena Potokina, Tianye Jia, Arnis Druka, Robbie Waugh, Michael J Kearsey, Zewei W Luo BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:284 (17 June 2008) Comparison of the most commonly used statistical methods for assessing differential gene expression from Affymetrix microarrays on a high-quality dataset shows that PDNN is the best performer, clearly superior to the standard Affymetrix MAS5.0 method.
|
|
Proceedings
Jun Ma, Zhaohui S Qin BMC Proceedings 2007, 1(Suppl 1):S154 (18 December 2007) |
|
Research
Amal J Johnston, Patrick Meier, Jacqueline Gheyselinck, Samuel EJ Wuest, Michael Federer, Edith Schlagenhauf, Jörg D Becker, Ueli Grossniklaus Genome Biology 2007, 8:R204 (3 October 2007) Genetic subtraction and expression profiling of wild-type |
|
Research article
Transcriptional profiling of C57 and DBA strains of mice in the absence and presence of morphine Dorothy E Grice, Ilkka Reenilä, Pekka T Männistö, Andrew I Brooks, George G Smith, Greg T Golden, Joseph D Buxbaum, Wade H Berrettini BMC Genomics 2007, 8:76 (16 March 2007) |
|
Methodology article
Simon Katz, Rafael A Irizarry, Xue Lin, Mark Tripputi, Mark W Porter BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:464 (23 October 2006) |
|
Methodology article
Martin Hoffmann, Dirk Pohlers, Dirk Koczan, Hans-Jürgen Thiesen, Stefan Wölfl, Raimund W Kinne BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:369 (4 August 2006) |
|
Research article
Roel GW Verhaak, Frank JT Staal, Peter JM Valk, Bob Lowenberg, Marcel JT Reinders, Dick de Ridder BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:105 (2 March 2006) Preprocessing normalization methods can strongly affect the results of a small microarray study; low-level analysis focusing on expression levels of specific transcripts is affected more profoundly than high-level multivariate analysis.
|
|
Research article
Evaluation of methods for oligonucleotide array data via quantitative real-time PCR Li-Xuan Qin, Richard P Beyer, Francesca N Hudson, Nancy J Linford, Daryl E Morris, Kathleen F Kerr BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:23 (17 January 2006) |
|
Research article
Sources of variation in Affymetrix microarray experiments Stanislav O Zakharkin, Kyoungmi Kim, Tapan Mehta, Lang Chen, Stephen Barnes, Katherine E Scheirer, Rudolph S Parrish, David B Allison, Grier P Page BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:214 (29 August 2005) Variation in Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays was mostly (between one half and two thirds) due to biological variation, with around a quarter due to labeling, and with under 14% being the result of differences in hybridization.
|