Table 4 |
||||||
|
Replacing regulatory coupling strength by response to transcription factor deletion. |
||||||
|
Transcription Factor |
Number of genes in each group |
GO category |
||||
|
|
||||||
|
B- |
B+/D+ |
B+/D- |
Not available |
B+/D+ |
B+/D- |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Dig1 |
5881 |
1 |
30 |
115 |
32 |
16 |
|
Gcn4 |
5928 |
16 |
63 |
60 |
19 |
17 |
|
Hir2 |
5941 |
2 |
19 |
105 |
24 |
5 |
|
Mbp1 |
5647 |
2 |
103 |
315 |
22 |
12 |
|
Swi4 |
5535 |
19 |
106 |
407 |
9 |
6 |
|
Swi5 |
5368 |
10 |
82 |
607 |
2 |
0 |
|
Yap1 |
5968 |
7 |
37 |
55 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
||||||
|
We analyzed the performance of a scheme in which our TF-gene coupling factor was replaced by the change in mRNA abundance in response to transcription factor deletion as a predictor of true targets. Significant binding (B+) was defined as before, while a significant response to deletion (D+) required P < 10-2. The number of significantly over-represented GO categories is listed for both the B+/D+ and the B+/D- gene groups. The results indicate that TF deletion data is less useful than our coupling factor for distinguishing functional target genes from non-functional ones. |
||||||
|
Gao et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2004 5:31 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5-31 |
||||||