Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Bioinformatics and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Haplotype frequency estimation error analysis in the presence of missing genotype data

Enda D Kelly1*, Fabian Sievers1 and Ross McManus2

Author Affiliations

1 Hitachi Dublin Lab., Hitachi Europe Ltd., O'Reilly Institute, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

2 Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Trinity College Dublin and Dublin Molecular Medicine Centre at St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:188  doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5-188

Published: 1 December 2004

Abstract

Background

Increasingly researchers are turning to the use of haplotype analysis as a tool in population studies, the investigation of linkage disequilibrium, and candidate gene analysis. When the phase of the data is unknown, computational methods, in particular those employing the Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm, are frequently used for estimating the phase and frequency of the underlying haplotypes. These methods have proved very successful, predicting the phase-known frequencies from data for which the phase is unknown with a high degree of accuracy. Recently there has been much speculation as to the effect of unknown, or missing allelic data – a common phenomenon even with modern automated DNA analysis techniques – on the performance of EM-based methods. To this end an EM-based program, modified to accommodate missing data, has been developed, incorporating non-parametric bootstrapping for the calculation of accurate confidence intervals.

Results

Here we present the results of the analyses of various data sets in which randomly selected known alleles have been relabelled as missing. Remarkably, we find that the absence of up to 30% of the data in both biallelic and multiallelic data sets with moderate to strong levels of linkage disequilibrium can be tolerated. Additionally, the frequencies of haplotypes which predominate in the complete data analysis remain essentially the same after the addition of the random noise caused by missing data.

Conclusions

These findings have important implications for the area of data gathering. It may be concluded that small levels of drop out in the data do not affect the overall accuracy of haplotype analysis perceptibly, and that, given recent findings on the effect of inaccurate data, ambiguous data points are best treated as unknown.