BMC Bioinformatics
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 Methodology articleStatistical implications of pooling RNA samples for microarray experimentsXuejun Peng1 , Constance L Wood1 , Eric M Blalock2 , Kuey Chu Chen2 , Philip W Landfield2 and Arnold J Stromberg1  1
Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA 2
Department of Molecular and Biomedical Pharmacology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA author email corresponding author email
BMC Bioinformatics 2003,
4:26doi:10.1186/1471-2105-4-26 Abstract
Background
Microarray technology has become a very important tool for studying gene expression profiles under various conditions. Biologists often pool RNA samples extracted from different subjects onto a single microarray chip to help defray the cost of microarray experiments as well as to correct for the technical difficulty in getting sufficient RNA from a single subject. However, the statistical, technical and financial implications of pooling have not been explicitly investigated.
Results
Modeling the resulting gene expression from sample pooling as a mixture of individual responses, we derived expressions for the experimental error and provided both upper and lower bounds for its value in terms of the variability among individuals and the number of RNA samples pooled. Using "virtual" pooling of data from real experiments and computer simulations, we investigated the statistical properties of RNA sample pooling. Our study reveals that pooling biological samples appropriately is statistically valid and efficient for microarray experiments. Furthermore, optimal pooling design(s) can be found to meet statistical requirements while minimizing total cost.
Conclusions
Appropriate RNA pooling can provide equivalent power and improve efficiency and cost-effectiveness for microarray experiments with a modest increase in total number of subjects. Pooling schemes in terms of replicates of subjects and arrays can be compared before experiments are conducted. |