Table 3

Comparison of two groups of TFs divided according to results on LASAGNA and ClustalW2
Factor Group 11mean Group 22mean p-value3
# TFBSs 4 25.07483 25.83333 0.1409
Mean of TFBS length 18.78626 17.56167 0.08451
SD of TFBS length 5 8.180204 6.921905 0.06295

1. LASAGNA performed better than ClustalW2 on TFs in this group.

2. ClustalW2 performed better than or equal to LASAGNA on TFs in this group.

3. Wilcoxon signed-rank test p-value.

4. Number of binding sites for each TF.

5. Standard deviation of binding site length for each TF.

Lee and Huang

Lee and Huang BMC Bioinformatics 2013 14:108   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-108

Open Data