Table 5 |
||||||
|
Sensitivity values by PSO |
||||||
|
Setting 1 |
Setting 2 |
Setting 3 |
||||
|
|
||||||
|
Fitness |
Sensitivity |
Fitness |
Sensitivity |
Fitness |
Sensitivity |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Dataset 1 |
0.2845 |
0.7622 |
0.0839 |
0.7203 |
0.2502 |
0.7554 |
|
Dataset 2 |
0.5718 |
0.7334 |
0.3647 |
0.7002 |
1.5170 |
0.7309 |
|
Dataset 3 |
1.8992 |
0.6865 |
1.0233 |
0.6463 |
1.9141 |
0.6620 |
|
Dataset 4 |
0.6657 |
0.7330 |
0.4732 |
0.7072 |
1.1542 |
0.7205 |
|
|
||||||
|
Comparisons of fitness and sensitivity values of the best solutions collected from the final generations. Experiments were conducted using the PSO method. |
||||||
|
Hsiao and Lee BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13(Suppl 7):S8 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-S7-S8 |
||||||
