Table 2
|
|
Exact algorithm vs heuristic.
|
|
|
Relative deviation
|
RF distance
|
|
Α
|
α( )
|
#adj
|
#edg
|
#exact results
|
exact
|
heuristic
|
|
|
0.001
|
-2.67%
|
2.83%
|
-0.23%
|
43
|
2
|
2
|
|
0.3
|
-3.47%
|
0.90%
|
0.31%
|
63
|
2
|
2
|
|
0.5
|
-4.26%
|
-1.03%
|
0.84%
|
61
|
2
|
2
|
|
0.8
|
-6.34%
|
-1.71%
|
1.14%
|
54
|
4
|
2
|
|
1
|
-8.41%
|
-2.39%
|
17.7%
|
48
|
6
|
2
|
|
|
Comparison of FFAdj-Int and FFAdj-MCS. The left side of the table shows the relative deviation in the objective function α( ), the number of adjacencies (#adj), and the size of the resulting matching (#edg), of heuristic results from the exact solutions under varying values of α. On the right, the RF distances between the true tree and trees based on exact and
heuristic results are listed.
|
|
Doerr et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13(Suppl 19):S3 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-S19-S3
|