Table 8

Evaluation results of Site extraction for different event types

Team

Phospho. (67)

Binding (84)

Reg. (71)


UT+DBCLS09

A

71.43/71.43/71.43

04.76/50.00/08.70

12.96/58.33/21.21


W

71.64/84.21/77.42

05.95/38.46/10.31

    28.17/60.61/38.46

FAUST

A

71.43/81.63/76.19

04.76/14.29/07.14

    29.63/66.67/41.03

F

    72.73/100.0/84.21

06.35/66.67/11.59

23.53/44.44/30.77


W

76.12/79.69/77.86

04.76/36.36/08.42

22.54/64.00/33.33

UMass

A

76.79/76.79/76.79

04.76/14.29/07.14

22.22/70.59/33.80

F

    72.73/100.0/84.21

04.76/75.00/08.96

    23.53/50.00/32.00


W

52.24/97.22/67.96

20.24/53.12/29.31

29.58/43.75/35.29

BMI@ASU

A

53.57/96.77/68.97

    09.52/22.22/13.33

31.48/51.52/39.08

F

45.45/100.0/62.50

23.81/65.22/34.88

23.53/26.67/25.00


W

    76.12/91.07/82.93

    21.43/51.43/30.25

28.17/44.44/34.48

UTurku

A

    78.57/89.80/83.81

09.52/18.18/12.50

31.48/54.84/40.00

F

63.64/100.0/77.78

    25.40/66.67/36.78

17.65/21.43/19.35


Evaluated performance is reported in recall/precision/f-score. Some notable figures are underlined.

Kim et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13(Suppl 11):S1   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-S11-S1

Open Data