Table 2

Results of Experiment 1
Measure Ligand HEAD C4.5 <a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/310/mathml/M7','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/310/mathml/M7">View MathML</a> <a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/310/mathml/M8','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/310/mathml/M8">View MathML</a> t
Accuracy ETH 0.71 ± 0.02 0.62 ± 0.02 0.08 0.0008 6.25
PIF 0.86 ± 0.00 0.80 ± 0.02 0.06 0.0004 6.22
TCL 0.65 ± 0.02 0.57 ± 0.02 0.08 0.0003 9.12
INH 0.84 ± 0.01 0.79 ± 0.01 0.05 0.0001 8.28
JPM 0.72 ± 0.02 0.65 ± 0.02 0.07 0.0004 7.62
Tree Size ETH 45.40 ± 9.88 539.80 ± 29.64 494.40 1174.04 31.48
PIF 6.80 ± 0.63 283.00 ± 39.97 276.20 1603.95 15.00
TCL 38.20 ± 8.17 588.00 ± 37.39 549.80 1549.73 30.40
INH 12.20 ± 3.91 278.60 ± 24.80 266.40 568.71 24.31
JPM 28.20 ± 6.48 483.80 ± 19.76 455.60 408.71 49.05

Table 2 presents the classification accuracy and tree size of HEAD-DT and C4.5 in the ETH, PIF, TCL, INH, and JPM data sets. HEAD-DT results were obtained by running a single decision-tree algorithm tailored to the NADH data set.

Barros et al.

Barros et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13:310   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-310

Open Data