Table 4

Pearson correlation coefficients calculated for selected GOBA metrics for the CASP9-in-contest test set
metaGA GA_468 GA_579 yGA_468 yGA_579 yGA_579†
T0520 0.47 0.74 0.38 0.8 0.84 0.98
T0529 FM 0.17 0.22 0.14 0.39 0.19 0.10
T0543 0.43 0.51 0.61 0.39 0.24
    0.96
T0547 FM 0.01 −0.01 0.11 0.76 0.76 0.81
T0561 FM 0.26 0.37 0.36 0.35 0.38 0.53
T0580 0.54 0.64 0.56 0.65 0.57 0.96
T0584 0.74 0.76 0.75 0.91 0.92 0.96
T0596 0.38 0.43 0.47 0.65 0.66 0.83
T0600 0.67 0.68 0.68 0.65 0.64 0.84
T0604* FM 0.33 0.32 0.34 0.81 0.67 0.88
T0614 0.47 0.46 0.56 0.59 0.57 0.56
T0619 0.17 0.1 0.12 0.21 0.21
    0.94
T0622 0.57 0.62 0.64 0.49 0.51 0.66
T0628* 0.29 0.38 0.38 −0.14 −0.15
    0.36
T0630* −0.40 −0.4 −0.38 −0.27 −0.26 −0.16
T0643 0.58 0.6 0.62 0.25 0.22 0.48

Asterisks mark targets, for which GOBA the performance is explained in text. Last column (marked with a cross sign) lists the results from CASP9 validation for corresponding targets. Scores with the greatest improvements in terms of yGA579 were underlined.

Konopka et al.

Konopka et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13:242   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-242

Open Data