Figure 8.

FDR computed from SAINT posterior probability output (<a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/128/mathml/M257','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/128/mathml/M257">View MathML</a>) as a function of procedural stages: from the initial “Naïve” stage (“N” – SAINT-only), to the “Reproducible” stage (“R”), and to the final “Specific” stage (“S” – ROCS-SAINT) in the CTNNBIP1 (left) and STK24 (right) AP-MS bait experiment. Results are reported for <a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/128/mathml/M258','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/128/mathml/M258">View MathML</a> and the marginal inclusion probability thresholds <a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/128/mathml/M259','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/128/mathml/M259">View MathML</a> and <a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/128/mathml/M260','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/128/mathml/M260">View MathML</a> as determined in each AP-MS experiment (see Tables 1 and 3).

Dazard et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13:128   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-128
Download authors' original image