Table 8 |
||||||
|
IMT Results |
||||||
|
Run |
Label |
Precision (%) |
Recall (%) |
F1-Score (%) |
MCC |
AUC iP/R (%) |
|
|
||||||
|
1 |
j48-21 |
52.52 |
49.53 |
50.98 |
0.500 |
28.20 |
|
2 |
rc-21 |
52.02 |
48.96 |
50.44 |
0.495 |
28.59 |
|
3 |
rf-21 |
50.78 |
49.34 |
50.05 |
0.490 |
27.24 |
|
4 |
j48-14 |
52.50 |
49.91 |
51.17 |
0.502 |
29.22 |
|
5 |
rf-12 |
52.58 |
52.18 |
52.38 |
0.514 |
29.98 |
|
6 |
rc-12 |
52.71 |
51.61 |
52.16 |
0.512 |
29.93 |
|
7 |
rc-14 |
52.28 |
50.10 |
51.16 |
0.502 |
30.05 |
|
8 |
rf-7 |
52.28 |
52.18 |
52.23 |
0.512 |
30.05 |
|
9 |
nbt-7 |
49.55 |
52.56 |
51.01 |
0.500 |
29.30 |
|
10 |
rf-15 |
51.76 |
50.29 |
51.01 |
0.500 |
29.80 |
|
|
||||||
|
The result of submitted IMT runs on the test data. Legend: MCC=Matthew’s correlation coefficient |
||||||
|
Agarwal et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2011 12(Suppl 8):S10 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-S8-S10 |
||||||
