Table 3 |
||||||
|
The simulation II results (top 100) |
||||||
|
Simulation |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Linear |
Polynomial |
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
R2 |
T.P |
cor. |
R2 |
T.P. |
cor. |
|
|
UR-VIM |
0.1444 |
9.0 |
0.2956 |
0.0862 |
8.2 |
0.3642 |
|
|
0.1907 |
8.8 |
0.2534 |
0.1605 |
7.2 |
0.2590 |
|
|
0.6059 |
19.9 |
0.2289 |
0.4132 |
19.2 |
0.2234 |
|
TMLE-VIM(λ) |
0.5916 |
20 |
0.1242 |
0.3859 |
17.7 |
0.0867 |
|
|
||||||
|
The candidate variable list contains the top 100 variables ranked by their p-values. |
||||||
|
Wang and van der Laan BMC Bioinformatics 2011 12:312 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-312 |
||||||
