Table 2 |
||||
|
Binding site prediction error for two domain-oriented methods and PIPE-Sites (this work) |
||||
|
Species |
Pairs originally in validation set |
Method |
Pairs with available predictions |
Error (average DM) |
|
|
||||
|
Yeast |
265 |
DPEA |
32 |
0.718 |
|
Yeast |
265 |
DOMINE |
144 |
0.363 |
|
Yeast |
265 |
PIPE-Sites (this work) |
174 |
0.218 |
|
Human |
423 |
DPEA |
2 |
N/A * |
|
Human |
423 |
DOMINE |
266 |
0.306 |
|
Human |
423 |
PIPE-Sites (this work) |
363 |
0.246 |
|
|
||||
|
DPEA [12] is a standalone statistical inference method, while DOMINE [25] is a database combining several experimental and computational domain-domain interaction sources. We used a consensus approach to combine the 13 constituent data sources of DOMINE to arrive at a single binding site prediction. Error is expressed as average distance between the predicted site and lab-confirmed site, averaged over all pairs. * Due to the small sample size (only 2 available predictions), it was impossible to calculate a statistically significant average DM for DPEA predictions. |
||||
|
Amos-Binks et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2011 12:225 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-225 |
||||