Table 2 |
||||||
|
Summary of synteny blocks before and after quota-based screening in the four examples used in this study. |
||||||
|
Example |
# of anchors |
# of blocks |
Percentage of regions exceed quota |
Run time |
CoGe link |
|
|
|
||||||
|
A. thaliana vs. A. lyrata (1:1) |
before |
27381 |
388 |
76.3% |
0.73s |
|
|
after |
20826 |
69 |
0.1% |
|||
|
A. thaliana vs. poplar (4:2) |
before |
16257 |
1084 |
18.4% |
0.55s |
|
|
after |
14839 |
910 |
1.9% |
|||
|
A. thaliana vs. A. thaliana (1:1) |
before |
6523 |
440 |
22.0% |
0.25s |
|
|
after |
5477 |
315 |
3.5% |
|||
|
grape vs. grape (2:2) |
before |
4459 |
270 |
9.0% |
0.24s |
|
|
after |
4297 |
259 |
2.7% |
|||
|
|
||||||
|
For each case, summary of blocks before screening is in the first row, and blocks after screening is in the second row. The running time for QUOTA-ALIGN is based on a single-threaded 3.0 GHz Intel Xeon CPU. |
||||||
|
Tang et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2011 12:102 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-102 |
||||||
