|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 2.
Selection of parameters of the algorithm. (A). Performance of motif-finding tools returning different numbers of top predictions
for recovering known TFBSs in E. coli K12 in the inter-operonic sequence sets. (B). Low bound prediction specificity of
the motif-finding tools returning different numbers of top predictions for recovering
known TFBSs in E. coli K12 in the inter-operonic sequence sets. (C). The number of total sites that are uniquely
predicted by a tool or jointly predicted by the tool and other four tools. (D). The
number of known TFBSs in E. coli K12 that are uniquely predicted by a tool or jointly predicted by the tool and other
four tools. (E). Effect of the selection of different groups of target genomes on
the prediction of known TFBSs in E. coli K12. (F). The distribution of motif similarity scores among the input motifs in the
target genomes and that of motif similarity scores among the sub-motifs of the known
motifs in E. coli K12 (RegulonDB) and B. subtilis (DBTBS).
Zhang et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2010 11:397 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-397 |