Table 5 |
|||
|
Relationships between taxon coverage of the reference database and identification success. |
|||
|
BM |
BCM |
||
|
|
|||
|
R2 = 1.00 |
R2 = 0.99 |
||
|
F = 651.91*** |
F = 236.178*** |
||
|
a = 0.986(0.001) |
t = 961.4747*** |
a = 0.999(0.002) |
t = 465.262*** |
|
b = -2.13 × 10-5 (1.74 × 10-6) |
t = -25.53262*** |
b = -2.68 × 10-5 (1.06 × 10-6) |
t = -15.368*** |
|
|
|||
|
Details of regression analyses of Figure 3. Regression lines were fitted according to the linear model y = a + bx (where a = y-intercept, b = slope). Goodness-of-fit is indicated by values of R2 close to 1.00 and by the statistical significance of (1) F-test of the overall fit, (2) t-tests of individual parameters. ***: p < 0.001. |
|||
|
Virgilio et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2010 11:206 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-206 |
|||
