Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Bioinformatics and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Selected Proceedings of the First Summit on Translational Bioinformatics 2008

Open Access Proceedings

Evaluation of a gene information summarization system by users during the analysis process of microarray datasets

Jianji Yang12*, Aaron Cohen1 and William Hersh1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA

2 Portland Center for the Evaluation of Clinical Services, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 2):S5  doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-S2-S5

Published: 5 February 2009

Abstract

Background

Summarization of gene information in the literature has the potential to help genomics researchers translate basic research into clinical benefits. Gene expression microarrays have been used to study biomarkers for disease and discover novel types of therapeutics and the task of finding information in journal articles on sets of genes is common for translational researchers working with microarray data. However, manually searching and scanning the literature references returned from PubMed is a time-consuming task for scientists. We built and evaluated an automatic summarizer of information on genes studied in microarray experiments. The Gene Information Clustering and Summarization System (GICSS) is a system that integrates two related steps of the microarray data analysis process: functional gene clustering and gene information gathering. The system evaluation was conducted during the process of genomic researchers analyzing their own experimental microarray datasets.

Results

The clusters generated by GICSS were validated by scientists during their microarray analysis process. In addition, presenting sentences in the abstract provided significantly more important information to the users than just showing the title in the default PubMed format.

Conclusion

The evaluation results suggest that GICSS can be useful for researchers in genomic area. In addition, the hybrid evaluation method, partway between intrinsic and extrinsic system evaluation, may enable researchers to gauge the true usefulness of the tool for the scientists in their natural analysis workflow and also elicit suggestions for future enhancements.

Availability

GICSS can be accessed online at: http://ir.ohsu.edu/jianji/index.html webcite