BMC Bioinformatics
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools: Post to:
|
 Research articleLinguistic feature analysis for protein interaction extractionTimur Fayruzov1 , Martine De Cock1,3 , Chris Cornelis1 and Veronique Hoste1,2  1
Ghent University, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Krijgslaan 281 (S9), 9000 Gent, Belgium 2
University College Ghent, School of Translation Studies, Groot-Brittanniëlaan 45, 9000 Gent, Belgium 3
University of Washington, Institute of Technology, 1900 Commerce Street, Tacoma, WA-98402, USA author email corresponding author email
BMC Bioinformatics 2009,
10:374doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-374
|
|
| Published: |
12 November 2009 |
Abstract
Background
The rapid growth of the amount of publicly available reports on biomedical experimental results has recently caused a boost of text mining approaches for protein interaction extraction. Most approaches rely implicitly or explicitly on linguistic, i.e., lexical and syntactic, data extracted from text. However, only few attempts have been made to evaluate the contribution of the different feature types. In this work, we contribute to this evaluation by studying the relative importance of deep syntactic features, i.e., grammatical relations, shallow syntactic features (part-of-speech information) and lexical features. For this purpose, we use a recently proposed approach that uses support vector machines with structured kernels.
Results
Our results reveal that the contribution of the different feature types varies for the different data sets on which the experiments were conducted. The smaller the training corpus compared to the test data, the more important the role of grammatical relations becomes. Moreover, deep syntactic information based classifiers prove to be more robust on heterogeneous texts where no or only limited common vocabulary is shared.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that grammatical relations play an important role in the interaction extraction task. Moreover, the net advantage of adding lexical and shallow syntactic features is small related to the number of added features. This implies that efficient classifiers can be built by using only a small fraction of the features that are typically being used in recent approaches. |