Table 9 |
|||||
|
Statistics on the E. Coli benchmark. |
|||||
|
Algorithms |
Best |
Worst |
Mean |
STD |
Top-scored |
|
|
|||||
|
GALF-G (15) |
0.260 |
0.094 |
0.121 |
0.031 |
0.169 |
|
GALF-G (rg) |
0.254 |
0.080 |
0.129 |
0.040 |
0.177 |
|
AlignACE |
0.128 |
0.029 |
0.072 |
0.045 |
0.083 |
|
BioProspector |
0.174 |
0.097 |
0.124 |
0.041 |
0.130 |
|
MDScan |
0.149 |
0.068 |
0.106 |
0.034 |
0.099 |
|
MEME |
0.158 |
0.002 |
0.054 |
0.069 |
0.116 |
|
MotifSampler |
0.153 |
0.010 |
0.062 |
0.065 |
0.069 |
|
Weeder |
0.152 |
0.031 |
0.081 |
0.106 |
0.064 |
|
|
|||||
|
The statistics of the top 5 predictions in terms of nPC on the ECRDB62A benchmark. GALF-G (15) is run with the fixed width 15 and GALF-G (rg) is run with the range [10,20]. STD is the standard deviation. The best mean and top-scored results are bold. |
|||||
|
Chan et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2009 10:321 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-321 |
|||||
