Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification of a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry11Ba toxin-binding aminopeptidase from the mosquito, Anopheles quadrimaculatus

BMC Biochemistry volume 7, Article number: 16 (2006) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Aminopeptidase N (APN) type proteins isolated from several species of lepidopteran insects have been implicated as Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin-binding proteins (receptors) for Cry toxins. We examined brush border membrane vesicle (BBMV) proteins from the mosquito Anopheles quadrimaculatus to determine if APNs from this organism would bind mosquitocidal Cry toxins that are active to it.

Results

A 100-kDa protein with APN activity (APNAnq 100) was isolated from the brush border membrane of Anopheles quadrimaculatus. Native state binding analysis by surface plasmon resonance shows that APNAnq 100 forms tight binding to a mosquitocidal Bt toxin, Cry11Ba, but not to Cry2Aa, Cry4Ba or Cry11Aa.

Conclusion

An aminopeptidase from Anopheles quadrimaculatus mosquitoes is a specific binding protein for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry11Ba.

Background

The main African vectors of malaria are in the Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes [1]. In general, all species of Anopheles have been found to be susceptible to a certain extent to infection by some strain of human plasmodia [2]. Studies on lepidopteran insects revealed several types of Bt toxin-binding proteins (receptors): aminopeptidase N (APN) -like proteins [3, 4]; cadherin-like proteins [5, 6]; a glycoconjugate [7] and glycolipids [8]. In mosquitoes, two types of receptors were discovered: a protein with maltase activity from Culex. pipiens that binds the Bin toxin of Bacillus sphaericus [9], and a 65 kDa protein of unknown function (lacking aminopeptidase activity) from Aedes aegypti that binds Cry4Ba and Cry11Aa [10]. Two APNs have been identified in Ae. aegypti but not associated with binding Cry proteins [11]

APNs (EC 3.4.11.2) are exopeptidases that cleave single amino acids from the N-terminus of a polypeptide. APNs are expressed in many tissues including the brain, the lung, blood vessels, primary cultures of fibroblasts [12], and have the highest levels in intestinal and kidney brushborder membranes [13]. APNs belong to the M1 family of zinc metallopeptidases [14], which includes related enzymes like aminopeptidase A [15], aminopeptidase B [16, 17], and leukotriene A4 hydrolase [18]. APNs have also been implicated as cellular receptors for human, canine, and feline coronaviruses [19].

In this study, intestinal APN from An. quadrimaculatus larvae was isolated and tested for binding ability to different mosquitocidal Cry toxins (Cry2Aa, Cry4Ba, Cry11Aa, and Cry11Ba). Membrane proteins were extracted from An. quadrimaculatus brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV) and separated by anion-exchange chromatography. Fractions containing APN activity were pooled and purified by size-exclusion chromatography. A 100-kDa protein with APN activity was isolated from the BBMV and its N-terminal sequence was determined to be AQLEDYRLNDDVRPTAYRIE. This protein was used to screen different mosquitocidal Cry toxins binding via Biacore analysis. From the screening, it was discovered that only Cry11Ba was able to bind the APN. A protein BLAST search limited to the arthropod database revealed three highly homologous An. gambiae APNs based on the N-terminal sequence.

Results

Purification of An. quadrimaculatus aminopeptidase N

SPR analysis requires purified ligands and analytes to be used. Solubilized An. quadrimaculatus BBMV proteins were separated by anion-exchange chromatography and all elution fractions were tested for APN activity. Fractions 19–21 and 24–34 showed APN activity. Fractions 19–21 were made up of a single peak, and fractions 24–34 were made up of at least two peaks (Fig. 1). Fractions 19–21 were pooled, concentrated, and purified further by size-exclusion chromatography. A single peak was eluted at around 75 ml of run volume that correspond to a protein size of about 100 kDa (Fig. 2A). This peak was collected and was determined to hold APN activity. SDS-PAGE analysis of the protein also indicated a size of 100 kDa (Fig. 2B) and the 100 kDa protein was highly purified. The 100 kDa protein was named APNAnq 100.

Figure 1
figure 1

Separation of An. quadrimaculatus aminopeptidase N from solubilized BBMV proteins by anion-exchange chromatography. The UV absorbance at 280 nm (mAU) is indicated at the top left corner, and the percent conductivity of buffer B (%) is indicated at the top right corner. Collected fractions are shown at the bottom in 2-ml intervals. Run volume is indicated at the bottom (ml). Fractions 19–21 and 24–34 contain APN activity.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

(A) Further purification of APN fractions (fractions 19–21) from anion-exchange chromatography of An. quadrimaculatus BBMV by size-exclusion chromatography. A single peak was eluted at 75 ml elution volume, corresponding to 100 kDa. (B) SDS-PAGE of purified APN (APNAnq 100) obtained in (A) above. The estimated sizes of the protein bands are indicated on both sides of the gel in kDa.

Full size image

Determination of binding affinity by SPR analysis

Initially, APNAnq 100 was evaluated for binding by SPR analysis to four Cry toxins (Cry2Aa, Cry4Ba, Cry11Aa and Cry11Ba), which were previously determined in this laboratory to have mosquitocidal activity towards An. quadrimaculatus (data not shown). Only Cry11Ba bound significantly to APNAnq 100. Further analysis of real-time binding kinetic of Cry11Ba to APNAnq 100 was performed at different analyte concentrations (Fig. 3), followed by global fitting of all the response curves. A 1:1 binding stoichiometry, including a drifting-baseline correction, produced the following apparent rate constants of the bimolecular interaction: k a = 184.0 M-1s-1 (± 1.0) and k d = 1.03 × 10-7 s-1 (± 4.01 × 10-6), K D = 0.56 nM. More complex binding models, such as 2-site independent binding (A + B1 ↔ AB1; A + B2 ↔ AB2), and 2-site sequential binding (A + B ↔ AB ↔ AB*) also gave as good fitting as the simple 1:1 binding (A + B ↔ AB) with χ2 = 0.112 (data not shown).

Figure 3
figure 3

Real-time binding of Cry11Ba to An. quadrimaculatus APNAnq 100. Experimental curves (jagged line) are shown overlaid with fitted curves (smooth line) obtained with the 1:1 Langmuir binding with drifting baseline model. The overlaid BIAcore response curves are shown for Cry11Ba toxin injections at 4, 8, 16, 32 μM as indicated.

Full size image

N-terminal sequence of APNAnq100

A twenty amino acid residue sequence (AQLEDYRLNDDVRPTAYRIE) was obtained from N-terminal sequencing of purified APNAnq 100. Data mining for similar sequences in the arthropod databases revealed high homology (80–85% identities) with 3 conceptual translated proteins from An. gambiae (Table 1). A BLAST search using the first protein's full amino acid sequence from An. gambiae (accession no. EAA08760.1) revealed homology with many aminopeptidases from organisms of other genera (data not shown). This would suggest that the three proteins from An. gambiae have aminopeptidase activity.

Table 1 Amino acid sequence similarities of the N-terminal sequence of APNAnq 100 from An. quadrimaculatus with three protein sequences from An. gambiae obtained through a BLAST search.
Full size table

Analysis of the N-terminal region with the program SignalP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/) predicted that the most probable cleavage site for the signal peptide sequence was between position 25 and 26 for EAA08760.1; between position 27 and 28 for EAA08763.1; and between position 28 and 29 for EAA08929.1. However, the sequences of the proteins shown in Table 2 start at positions further downstream from the predicted cleavage sites, which suggested that there might have been further processing of the N-terminal region of the An. quadrimaculatus APN. Analysis of the C-terminal region for possible glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor sites using the program Big-PI Predictor (http://mendel.imp.univie.ac.at/gpi/gpi_server.html) found no potential GPI-modification site for EAA08760.1. Potential GPI-modification sites were found at position 930 and 920 for EAA08763.1 and EAA08929.1, respectively. Analysis of the sequences using the program NetOGlyc 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetOGlyc/) [20] to reveal potential GalNAc O-glycosylation sites found 5 sites in EAA08760.1, 7 sites in EAA08763.1, and 6 sites in EAA08929.1. Analysis of the sequences using NetNGlyc 1.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/) [21] to reveal potential N-glycosylation sites found 2 sites in EAA08760.1, 8 sites in EAA08763.1, and 3 sites in EAA08929.1.

Table 2 Putative aminopeptidases in An. gambiae that contain a conserved MAAVPDFSAGAMENWGLL sequence.
Full size table

Another protein BLAST search was performed using the sequence of a known conserved region for aminopeptidases (MAAVPDFSAGAMENWGLL) [22], which yielded 16 homologous proteins from the An. gambiae genomic database (Table 2). This indicated that there are a large number of aminopeptidase isomers in these mosquitoes.

Discussion and conclusion

An aminopeptidase N (APN) type protein has been implicated as a Cry toxin-binding protein in several lepidopteran species: Manduca sexta [4], Bombyx mori [23, 24], Lymantria dispar [25, 26], Heliothis virescens [27], Plutella xylostella [28], Trichoplusia ni [29], Helicoverpa armigera [30] and Spodoptera litura [31]. Recently the binding epitopes of Cry1Aa to an APN from B. mori have been mapped by monoclonal antibody inhibition [32]. Thus, targeting APN for analysis as a possible toxin-binding protein is a reasonable approach.

The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) method allows analysis of bimolecular interaction in the native state, without a potentially interfering label [33]. Thus, since the Cry11Ba and APNAnq 100 interaction detected in this study represents tight (ca. 1 nM K D ) native-state binding, we propose that APNAnq 100 is a putative receptor for Cry11Ba. APNAnq 100 did not bind to Cry2Aa, Cry4Ba or Cry11Aa even though the toxins have insecticidal activity against An. quadrimaculatus. The specific binding of Cry11Ba to APNAnq 100 suggests that its mode of action would be different from Cry2Aa, Cry4Ba, or Cry11Aa.

The N-terminal sequence of APNAnq 100 showed high homology with three putative APNs from An. gambiae. One or more of these APNs could act as a binding protein for Cry11Ba.

Recently the binding epitopes of Cry1Aa to an APN from B. mori have been mapped by monoclonal antibody inhibition [32].

Methods

Preparation of mosquito brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV)

Fourth instars An. quadrimaculatus larvae were filtered with a nylon mesh, washed in distilled water, separated from large residual food particles, and dried briefly on a filter paper (Fisher) under vacuum suction. Harvested larvae were frozen at -70°C until needed. About 4–6 g of frozen larvae were homogenized in 8–12 ml of cold buffer A (300 mM mannitol, 5 mM EGTA, 17 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). Larvae were homogenized by 40 strokes of Potter-Elvehjem PTFE pestle in glass tube at speed number 5 (~6000 rpm). BBMV were enriched through differential centrifugation by selective divalent-cation precipitations as described by Silva-Filha, et al [34]. The BBMV pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of ice-cold binding buffer (8 mM NaHPO4 , 2 mM KH2 PO4 , 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) supplemented with COMPLETE™ (Roche) protease inhibitor and homogenized by10 extrusions using a small Teflon pestle.The protein concentration of the BBMV was measured with the Coomassie protein assay reagent (Pierce), using BSA as the standard. The BBMV was kept at -70°C until needed.

Purification of An. quadrimaculatus aminopeptidase N (APN) from BBMV

Approximately 20 mg of BBMV was solubilized overnight at 4°C in the binding buffer supplemented with 10 mg/ml of CHAPS (Roche). Later, the solution was vortexed briefly and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm in a JA-17 rotor at 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant was treated with PIPLC for 1 hr at 37°C. The supernatant was separated by anion-exchange chromatography (HiTrap 5 ml column, Pharmacia) by continuous salt gradient using two buffers: A, 20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 0.4 mg/ml CHAPS; B, buffer A with 1 M NaCl. Two milliliters elution fractions were collected at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. A small fraction of each elution fraction was tested for the presence of APN activity using L-leucine p-nitroanilide (Sigma) as substrate. Neighboring fractions containing APN activities were pooled and concentrated using centricon (YM30, Millipore) according to the manufacturer. The pooled fractions were further purified by size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200, Pharmacia) in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 0.4 mg/ml CHAPS and concentrated as before. The quality of the sample was checked by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) as described by Laemmli [35].

Purification of Cry toxins

An E. coli clone of Cry2Aa (a grateful gift from Takashi Yamamoto) was used as a source of this gene. The cry2Aa gene was extracted by PCR and cloned into plasmid pHT600 and transformed into B. thuringiensis 4Q7, a plasmidless Cry- derivitive. The genes cry4Aa, cry4Ba, cry11Aa and cry11Ba were received in the same plasmid vector and host B. thuringiensis strain (gratefully donated by Armelle Delécluse). Single Bt colonies were inoculated into a 5 ml LB medium supplemented with 10 μg/ml erythromycin and grown overnight at 30°C in an incubator-shaker at 250 rpm. These cultures were inoculated into a 500 ml SSM medium [36] also supplemented with erythromycin and incubated a further 4 days until sporulation and autolysis. Bt crystals in the autolysed-cells suspension were purified as described previously [37] for purification of Cry toxins expressed in E. coli, except that the sonication steps were omitted. The crystals were solubilized in carbonate buffer (30 mM Na2 CO3 , 20 mM NaHCO3 , pH 10.0) supplemented with 10 mM dithiothreitol (Roche) at 37°C for 3 hours. Next, the solubilized toxin was incubated with 1/20 (v/v) 10 mg/ml trypsin (Sigma) at 37°C for 3 hours. The activated toxin was purified by FPLC using a Superdex 200 (Pharmacia) column in the carbonate buffer. Protein concentration was measured using the Coomassie protein assay reagent (Pierce) with bovine serum albumin as standard.

Biosensor analysis of toxin-APN affinities

All surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments were performed on a BIAcore 3000 machine (Biacore AB). An. quadrimaculatus APN in 20 mM ammonium acetate, pH 4.2, was immobilized on a CM5 sensor chip by amine-coupling method (Biacore AB). The flow buffer HBS-EP (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.005% polysorbate 20 (v/v), pH 7.4) (Biacore AB) was used at a flow rate of 30 μl/min. Multiple concentrations (4, 8, 16, and 32 μM) of Cry11Ba was injected across the flow cell containing the APN and one blank flow cell containing ethanolamine as a blocking agent. Surfaces were regenerated with 2 pulses of 10 μl of 10 mM NaOH, pH 11, at 100 μl/min or until the signal return to baseline. Signal responses from the blank flow cells were subtracted from all response curves and data were globally fitted using BIAevaluation Ver. 3.1 (Biacore AB). The curves were fitted to a simple 1:1 Langmuir binding model (A+B ↔ AB) to obtain apparent rate constants.

N-terminal sequencing and sequence similarity search

For N-terminal sequencing, proteins separated in SDS-PAGE were transferred onto PVDF membrane (Roche) by electro-transfer (Mini-PROTEANâ„¢ II, Bio Rad) according to the manufacturer. The membrane was stained briefly with Coomassie Blue R-250 and destained in 50% methanol. Bands representing 100-kDa proteins were excised and sequencing was performed on an automated sequencer (Model 477A, Applied Biosystems) at USDA Forest Service Laboratory, Delaware, OH. Data mining was performed on the N-terminal sequence using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST), an on-line tool, at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website. The search parameter was limited to arthropods. CLUSTAL W (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=npsa_clustalw.html) was used to align the amino acid sequences.

References

  1. Ye-Ebiyo Y, Pollack RJ, Spielman A: Enhanced development in nature of larval Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes feeding on maize pollen. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 63: 90-93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bates M: The natural history of mosquitoes. 1949, New York , The Macmillan Company, 379-

    Google Scholar 

  3. Knight PJK, Crickmore N, Ellar DJ: The receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(c) delta-endotoxin in the brush border membrane of the lepidopteran Manduca sexta is aminopeptidase N. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 11 (3): 429-436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sangadala S, Walters FS, English LH, Adang MJ: A mixture of Manduca sexta aminopeptidase and phosphatase enhances Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal CryIA(c) toxin binding and 86Rb+-K+ efflux in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 10088-10092.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vadlamudi RK, Ji TH, Bulla LAJ: A specific binding protein from Manduca sexta for the insecticidal toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. berliner. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 12334-12340.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagamatsu Y, Toda S, Yamaguchi F, Ogo M, Kogure M, Nakamura M, Shibata Y, Katsumoto T: Identification of Bombyx mori midgut receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal CryIA(a) toxin. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1998, 62 (4): 718-726. 10.1271/bbb.62.718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Valaitis AP, Jenkins JL, Lee MK, Dean DH, Garner KJ: Isolation and partial characterization of gypsy moth BTR-270, an anionic brush border membrane glycoconjugate that binds Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxins with high affinity. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2001, 46: 186-200. 10.1002/arch.1028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffitts JS, Haslam SM, Yang T, Garczynski SF, Mulloy B, Morris H, Cremer PS, Dell A, Adang MJ, Aroian RV: Glycolipids as receptors for Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxin. Science. 2005, 307: 922-925. 10.1126/science.1104444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Darboux I, Nielsen-LeRoux C, Charles JF, Pauron D: The receptor of Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin in Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) midgut: molecular cloning and expression. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2001, 31: 981-990. 10.1016/S0965-1748(01)00046-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buzdin AA, Revina LP, Kostina LI, Zalunin IA, Chestukhina GG: Interaction of 65- and 62-kDa proteins from the apical membranes of the Aedes aegypti larvae midgut epithelium with Cry4B and Cry11A endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2002, 67: 540-546. 10.1023/A:1015594127636.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pootanakit K, Angsuthanasombat C, Panyim S: Identification of two isoforms of aminopeptidase N in Aedes aegypti larval midgut. J Biochem Molec Biol. 2004, 36: 508-513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanderink GJ, Artur Y, Siest G: Human aminopeptidases: a review of the literature. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1988, 26 (12): 795-807.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maroux S, Louvard D, Baratti J: The aminopeptidase from hog intestinal brush border. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973, 321 (1): 282-295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ: Evolutionary families of metallopeptidases. Methods Enzymol. 1995, 248: 183-228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nanus DM, Engelstein D, Gastl GA, Gluck L, Vidal MJ, Morrison M, Finstad CL, Bander NH, Albino AP: Molecular cloning of the human kidney differentiation antigen gp160: human aminopeptidase A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90 (15): 7069-7073. 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fukasawa KM, Fukasawa K, Kanai M, Fujii S, Harada M: Molecular cloning and expression of rat liver aminopeptidase B. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (48): 30731-30735. 10.1074/jbc.271.48.30731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cadel S, Foulon T, Viron A, Balogh A, Midol-Monnet S, Noel N, Cohen P: Aminopeptidase B from the rat testis is a bifunctional enzyme structurally related to leukotriene-A4 hydrolase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997, 94 (7): 2963-2968. 10.1073/pnas.94.7.2963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Funk CD, Radmark O, Fu JY, Matsumoto T, Jornvall H, Shimizu T, Samuelsson B: Molecular cloning and amino acid sequence of leukotriene A4 hydrolase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987, 84 (19): 6677-6681. 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tresnan DB, Holmes KV: Feline aminopeptidase N is a receptor for all group I coronaviruses. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998, 440: 69-75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen JE, Lund O, Tolstrup N, Gooley AA, Williams KL, Brunak S: NetOglyc: Prediction of mucin type O-glycosylation sites based on sequence context and surface accessibility. Glycocon J. 1998, 15: 115-130. 10.1023/A:1006960004440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta R, Jung E, Brunak S: Prediction of N-glycosylation sites in human proteins. In preparation. 2002

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gill SS, Cowles EA, Francis V: Identification, isolation, and cloning of a Bacillus thuringiensis CryIAc toxin-binding protein from the midgut of the lepidopteran insect Heliothis virescens. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270 (45): 27277-27282. 10.1074/jbc.270.45.27277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hua G, Tsukamoto K, Rasilo ML, Ikezawa H: Molecular cloning of a GPI-anchored aminopeptidase N from Bombyx mori midgut: a putative receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA toxin. Gene. 1998, 214: 177-185. 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00199-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yaoi K, Nakanishi K, Kadotani T, Imamura M, Koizumi N, Iwahana H, Sato R: cDNA cloning and expression of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa toxin binding 120 kDa aminopeptidase N from Bomyx mori. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999, 1444: 131-137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee MK, You TH, Young BA, Valaitis AP, Dean DH: Aminopeptidase N purified from gypsy moth BBMV is a specific receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CryIAc toxin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996, 62: 2845-2849.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Garner KJ, Hiremath S, Lehtoma K, Valaitis AP: Cloning and complete sequence characterization of two gypsy moth aminopeptidase-N cDNAs, including the receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1999, 29: 527-535. 10.1016/S0965-1748(99)00027-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Luo K, Sangadala S, Masson L, Mazza A, Brousseau R, Adang MJ: The Heliothis virescens 170 kDa aminopeptidase functions as "receptor A" by mediating specific Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A d-endotoxin binding and pore formation. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1997, 27: 735-743. 10.1016/S0965-1748(97)00052-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakanishi K, Yaoi K, Shimada N, Kadotani T, Sato R: Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal Cry1Aa toxin binds to a highly conserved region of aminopeptidase N in the host insect leading to its evolutionary success. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999, 1432 (1): 57-63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lorence A, Darzon A, Bravo A: Aminopeptidase dependent pore formation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin on Trichoplusia ni membranes. FEBS Lett. 1997, 414: 303-307. 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)01014-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ingle SS, Trivedi N, Prasad R, Kuruvilla J, Rao KK, Chhatpar HS: Aminopeptidase-N from the Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) brush border membrane vesicles as a receptor of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac delta-endotoxin. Curr Microbiol. 2001, 43 (4): 255-259. 10.1007/s002840010297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Agrawal N, Malhotra P, Bhatnagar RK: Interaction of Gene-Cloned and Insect Cell-Expressed Aminopeptidase N of Spodoptera litura with Insecticidal Crystal Protein Cry1C. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002, 68 (9): 4583-4592. 10.1128/AEM.68.9.4583-4592.2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Atsumi S, Mizono E, Hara H, Nakanishi K, Kitami M, Miura N, Tabunoki H, Watanabe A, Sato R: Loatation of the Bombyx mori aminopeptidase N type 1 binding site on Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa toxin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71: 3966-3977. 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3966-3977.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fägerstam LG, Frostell A, Karlsson R, Kullman M, Larsson A, Malmqvist M, Butt H: Detection of antigen-antibody interactions by surface plasmon resonance. Application to epitope mapping. J Mol Recognit. 1990, 3: 208-214. 10.1002/jmr.300030507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Silva-Filha MH, Nielsen-Leroux C, Charles JF: Binding kinetics of Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin to midgut brush-border membranes of Anopheles and Culexsp. mosquito larvae. Eur J Biochem. 1997, 247: 754-761. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00754.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schaeffer P, Millet J, Aubert JP: Catabolic repression of bacterial sporulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1965, 54: 704-711. 10.1073/pnas.54.3.704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee MK, Milne RE, Ge AZ, Dean DH: Location of a Bombyx mori receptor binding region on a Bacillus thuringiensis d-endotoxin. J Biol Chem. 1992, 267: 3115-3121.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Curtiss for technical assistance. This work was supported by NIH grant to D.H. Dean and M.J. Adang (Grant # R01 AI 29092).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry and The Protein Research Group, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA

    Mohd Amir F Abdullah & Donald H Dean

  2. Department of Science, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Mohd Amir F Abdullah

  3. Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Mohd Amir F Abdullah

  4. USDA Forest Service, Delaware, Ohio, USA

    Algimantas P Valaitis

Authors
  1. Mohd Amir F Abdullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Algimantas P Valaitis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Donald H Dean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald H Dean.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

MAFA and DHD planned the study and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. MAFA conducted all experiments, except the N-terminal amino acid analysis. APV conducted the N-terminal amino acid analysis. All authors were involved in revising the manuscript and giving final approval of the version to be published.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdullah, M.A.F., Valaitis, A.P. & Dean, D.H. Identification of a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry11Ba toxin-binding aminopeptidase from the mosquito, Anopheles quadrimaculatus. BMC Biochem 7, 16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-7-16

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-7-16

Keywords

BMC Biochemistry

ISSN: 1471-2091

Contact us